Save Local What Now?

Editor, Times & Transcript,

CTV might have a case to make in some of the communities it serves, but it has a lot of gall asking people in Moncton to join in its "save local television" campaign.

The network has a minimal presence in New Brunswick and offers 'local' news only from its station in Halifax, 300 kilometers away and in another province. Its political commentators know little about the New Brunswick environment and appear to care less. We do not have 'local' news from CTV here in Moncton and haven't for a very long time.

For this, we are being asked to 'save local news' by having our cable companies pay them a fee - a cost that would in short order be transferred to viewers. And while CTV says the company receives "absolutely nothing in return for our signal", they forget to mention that the CRTC requires the cable company to carry the signal, and consumers to subscribe to it, contributing greatly to their advertising revenue.

CTV also neglects to mention the cause of its current financial difficulties. The current arrangement worked very well for them for many years. What changed was that CTVglobemedia was involved in a series of acquisitions over the last few years, including a $2.3 billion takeover by Bell Canada Enterprises and an announced $1.7 billion bid to take over CHUM, the owner of CITY-TV and A-Channel. Now the company can't pay its debts and we, the consumers, are effectively being asked to pay for their consolidation of Canadian media under single ownership.

You won't see any of this on the website, of course. True to its roots as the news organization that sent two of its most high-profile reporters, Mike Duffy and Pamela Wallen, to the Senate as Conservative politicians, CTV does not allow readers to post comments on the site and does not link to - or even mention - any opposition to its proposal. Its presentation of this issue, like its news, is intolerably one-sided.

Here's a better idea to save local broadcasting: return the ownership of local broadcast licenses to local owners. The current licensing arrangement is perfectly profitable if you are not gambling in the stock market or playing politics, and it would be nice to see local news here in New Brunswick instead of the out-of-province fare we have been given in its stead.


  1. I will agree with your points and add a couple of my own:

    The private stations have been gutting local programming for many years. In Ontario, most of the programming and operations is performed out of Toronto. Thanks to automation, stations can appear local when they really aren't.

    The CRTC allows over-the-air TV stations to air more commercials per hour than stations that only go on cable or satellite.

    See my blogpost for more detailed information:

  2. I really like the Atlantic coverage from CTV... and the news reporting is great too. Who can forget the Dion intervew. If I want a portion of my cable bill to go to the local TV station, what's the problem? Really. Cable and satellite companies pay these fees in the US, and it is working for consumers. Look at your cable bill and the channels you pay for, and consider the channels you actually watch. Right now we pay for crap we dont watch while we are loosing the stations that deliver the news and programming we do watch. Somethings not right.

  3. The Dion interview was a shameful piece of yellow journalism.

  4. Great piece Stephen!

    I didn't realize that CTV did not allow comments on their stories... crazy!


Post a Comment

Your comments will be moderated. Sorry, but it's not a nice world out there.

Popular Posts